LS.com homepage  •   LS.com FAQ  •   Resources
In the media  •   Articles  •   WIKI
It is currently 18 Jun 2013, 07:21

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Forum rules


This is the one of the guest-viewable discussion areas. If you haven't already, sign up as a user (everything is, and always will be, completely free)! Users can engage in discussion in both guest-viewable and member-only subforums. There's also an arcade.

Please post in good faith. We support freedom of speech here but deliberately inflammatory posts will be deleted. Use common sense when writing posts and be sure to read the guidelines (and weep) before posting.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2012, 21:29 
Offline
Elite Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 19:10
Posts: 3392
Location: Fresno, California. USA
Thanks: 506
Thanked:
1250 times in 726 posts
and the courts that "let them go"

Not too far north of me is small city called "Livingston" where the huge "Foster Farms" chicken plant is. Anyway, a few days ago a story broke out that a female teacher seduced a fifteen-year-old boy into sex. She was his mentor in the school, and she evidently blackmailed and threatened him if he "ever told" on her.

Well she was "arrested" and the bail was set at 400K. Trial date was to be set. The penalty in California is a minimum of twelve years in state prison.

This morning on KJO (Fresno news / talk) a report comes up about this teacher.

Her attorney claimed that the set bail broke her Constitutional rights of being "too excessive"
The "Judge" in Merced County lowered the bail to 25K

She is now free until the trial, and Merced County School's decided to "keep her on salary, but put her in administrative support until the outcome of the trial"

Her attorney also is trying to work a "deal" where IF convicted, the jail term be lowered to six months to a year because she is a "working, single mom" and has a small child to take care of. And, putting her on a sex-offenders list would be "unjust"

In Clovis Unified Schools three weeks earlier........

A man was accused of a sex crime with a teenage girl (14). He is still in "jail" until the trial because he cannot afford the 500K bail. His teachers' union and the Clovis Unified School Board "terminated" him. The Judge in Fresno decreed there would be "no plea deal" and the man would have to register as a sex offender, after sentence served.

Why wasn't the woman given the same charges as this man rightfully deserved to get?????????????????

_________________
Men invented the Internet because women took over television


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2012, 21:39 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7802
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 554
Thanked:
980 times in 710 posts
because shit's fucked up beyond comprehension, of course.

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2012, 21:46 
Offline
Elite Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 19:10
Posts: 3392
Location: Fresno, California. USA
Thanks: 506
Thanked:
1250 times in 726 posts
I'm really upset at this......I am tired of everyone "tee-heeing" over stuff like this when it happens to a teenage boy......all the late-night showes make jokes like "He was probably really into it"

while if it is a teenage girl "she was PREYED upon, and it must have been forced"

You know, the judge in this case involving the female teacher didn't even give her a "lecture" aboiut appropriate behavior with a student, didn't even say "stay away from the plantiff and his family"

_________________
Men invented the Internet because women took over television


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2012, 21:49 
Offline
Bitches love lasers.
User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 19:51
Posts: 7802
Location: N.Ireland
Thanks: 554
Thanked:
980 times in 710 posts
the morons we have in charge of the state who can't separate themselves impartially from their evolutionarily derived instincts that are no longer applicable, whilst making judgements that have profound effects on people's lives.

_________________
Image
Malek wrote:
I would ban you from this forum faster than fschmidt on IncelSupport.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2012, 22:00 
Offline
LS.com Legend
User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2010, 20:05
Posts: 7454
Location: Back in the USSA
Thanks: 1160
Thanked:
1084 times in 789 posts
gmartinfan wrote:
and the courts that "let them go"

Not too far north of me is small city called "Livingston" where the huge "Foster Farms" chicken plant is. Anyway, a few days ago a story broke out that a female teacher seduced a fifteen-year-old boy into sex. She was his mentor in the school, and she evidently blackmailed and threatened him if he "ever told" on her.

Well she was "arrested" and the bail was set at 400K. Trial date was to be set. The penalty in California is a minimum of twelve years in state prison.

This morning on KJO (Fresno news / talk) a report comes up about this teacher.

Her attorney claimed that the set bail broke her Constitutional rights of being "too excessive"
The "Judge" in Merced County lowered the bail to 25K

She is now free until the trial, and Merced County School's decided to "keep her on salary, but put her in administrative support until the outcome of the trial"

Her attorney also is trying to work a "deal" where IF convicted, the jail term be lowered to six months to a year because she is a "working, single mom" and has a small child to take care of. And, putting her on a sex-offenders list would be "unjust"

In Clovis Unified Schools three weeks earlier........

A man was accused of a sex crime with a teenage girl (14). He is still in "jail" until the trial because he cannot afford the 500K bail. His teachers' union and the Clovis Unified School Board "terminated" him. The Judge in Fresno decreed there would be "no plea deal" and the man would have to register as a sex offender, after sentence served.

Why wasn't the woman given the same charges as this man rightfully deserved to get?????????????????


Because the judge is another mangina. I hope this country goes down in flames, soon. Women have been given WAY too
much power, and its going to lead to a downfall/collapse sooner or later.

Next time I get called up for jury duty I am going to inform the court that I am MGTOW and I will vote any woman guilty for all charges, no matter what.

Contrary to popular belief, people just get sent packing when the attorneys hear things like that, not in contempt of court.

_________________
"Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Shadow knows!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6inwzOooXRU

"A Star on Earth; an Angel in Heaven" -Karen Anne Carpenter (1950-1983)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
“There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” – Ayn Rand


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2012, 23:00 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: 05 Nov 2011, 22:29
Posts: 832
Thanks: 89
Thanked:
125 times in 86 posts
Welcome to the land of Double Standard
Image

_________________
不幸は孤独です。。:゚(。ノω\。)゚・。
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 12 Jun 2012, 23:15 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 02:09
Posts: 3270
Location: The Rust Belt
Thanks: 55
Thanked:
143 times in 105 posts
gmartinfan wrote:
...Why wasn't the woman given the same charges as this man rightfully deserved to get?????????????????
The law was originally designed to keep older men away from teenaged girls, not to keep older women away from teenaged boys. The people who requested and made the laws were still human beings with base instincts, and they wanted (maybe or maybe not consciously) their sons to get any free pussy they could, while keeping all the other dicks out of their daughters' pussies.

Back in the old days, an older man, whose social skills were far superior to a teenaged boy's because of his longer life and experience, might be in position to seduce an underaged girl, knock her up and then walk away, which would cause embarrassment to her family and render her nearly worthless as marriage material. By contrast, a teenaged boy who got into an older woman's pants took no meaningful risks, except for the possibility of venereal disease. If anything, it was experience or an initiation for him, the lucky bastard. The woman involved was considered old enough to know what she was doing, even if that was risking pregnancy or violating the suffocating moral code of the day.

I'm not saying it's right or justified, but this is how it was, and still how it is. The attitude is still with us today, whether we as a society want to admit it or not.

_________________
If I can do it, anyone can.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following users would like to thank ieatboogers for the above post:
GrinSweeper, darwin
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2012, 01:12 
Offline
LS.com Legend
User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2010, 20:05
Posts: 7454
Location: Back in the USSA
Thanks: 1160
Thanked:
1084 times in 789 posts
AKU wrote:
Welcome to the land of Double Standard
Image


MILF'S. :crazy:

Another great reason to go MGTOW after 40 years of age. :coolbeans:

What a bunch of skank-ho's! :check:

_________________
"Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Shadow knows!"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6inwzOooXRU

"A Star on Earth; an Angel in Heaven" -Karen Anne Carpenter (1950-1983)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
“There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” – Ayn Rand


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2012, 03:27 
Offline
Poster

Joined: 08 Jun 2012, 06:31
Posts: 89
Thanks: 9
Thanked:
23 times in 8 posts
That's just sick.

My dad had sex with his 14 year old babysitter when he was just 9 years old. We're Hispanic. When my dad's stepdad found out, he congratulated him for "being a man." When he was 13, as a birthday present, his stepdad paid for him to have a prostitute, and he got the clap.

My dad is probably one of the more fucked up people you'd ever meet. Why don't people realize that this sort of thing hurts boys just as much as it does girls?

I HATE TWILIGHT


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2012, 05:46 
Offline
Poster

Joined: 28 Jul 2008, 04:18
Posts: 262
Location: Australia
Thanks: 66
Thanked:
16 times in 14 posts
This will get your blood boiling then:

Quote:
Not Every Schoolboy’s Fantasy
Arizona teacher Gabriela Compton sexually abused two teenage boys. Why did she get off with a slap on the wrist?

By Emily Bazelon|Posted Wednesday, May 16, 2012, at 4:51 PM ET

When male teachers sext or have sex with their students, nobody laughs. When female teachers do this, the titters don’t stop. Fictional examples: Skins, Big Love, and many more. Real-life example: this wink-wink blog post about Gabriela Compton, a 21-year-old (former) middle-school teacher’s aide in Phoenix, Ariz. Compton sent a 14-year-old boy at her school a picture of herself topless. He sexted back a photo of a penis he’d found on the Internet. A few sexts later, Compton found herself accused of having sex with the boy in the back of her van. A 13-year-old went to the police and said he’d sexted with Compton, too, and she reportedly admitted to that and the sex, too. She was charged with three counts of sexual abuse, three counts of sexual abuse with a minor, and one other related count. Altogether the charges carried a maximum sentence of 39 years in prison. In March, she pled guilty to the sexual abuse counts—and got a sentence of lifetime probation. She’ll have to register as a sex offender, but she won’t go to prison.

As law professor and sentencing guru Doug Berman points out, it is not really possible to imagine a male teacher getting off so lightly for having sex with a 14-year-old girl. Is Compton’s light sentence typical? Can it be justified?


Rest of the article here:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2012/05/gabriela_compton_received_lifetime_probation_for_sexually_abusing_two_boys_.html.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 13 Jun 2012, 15:23 
Offline
T-800, moderator version
User avatar

Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 13:10
Posts: 7370
Thanks: 65
Thanked:
834 times in 468 posts
When I was a kid, I would of fucked adult women, if the women initiated.

_________________
Virgin father with more offspring than most men. Forget your archaic understanding of nature's rules, and realize that reality itself is completely customizable, once you figure out how.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2087522/Virgin-father-14-kids-Sperm-donor-Trent-Arsenault-admits-hes-36-year-old-VIRGIN.html


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: 14 Jun 2012, 23:32 
Offline
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 02:09
Posts: 3270
Location: The Rust Belt
Thanks: 55
Thanked:
143 times in 105 posts
Let's have a poll. viewtopic.php?f=1&t=17279

_________________
If I can do it, anyone can.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group