Wait...this is a thread about how age levels should be mixed at schools so that men can more easily get partners...?

Ok...do you advocate pushing women to a higher level of education at a younger age, slowing the rate of study for men or some mix of the two to result in mixed age classes with the same instructional content?

I'm either missing something key or this is a really stupid idea. It's not just mixed age level homeroom or elective courses?

well if you're going to change anything best to keep boys and girls seperated in high school, not that i'm for that but thats the age that hormones come into play and start or could interfere with schoolwork

yeah, changing the ages of boys and girls in the same class is a bit ridiculous.

I went to an all-boys school, and for an LS guy it makes finding a gf impossible. i'm of mixed feelings about mixed schools. girls create a lot of academic distraction, and the resulting education system in application will probably be biased towards girls. on the other hand, a mixed school promotes a better social development, i think.

Surely this sort of age gap is more natural, and considered more normal, when the two parties are adults?

It certainly wasn't considered natural or normal when I was at school. It was considered taboo. And I see no reason to think anything has changed. Going through school with virtually every girl in the same year as me making a strong point of asserting they would never go out with me, ensuring I was going to be incel all the way through school at least, I found that any attention I got from girls was from those 3 or 4 or 5 years below me. And I just could not act on it because of what was a pretty strong taboo.

There's a case for having girls educated along with boys when the girls are a year or two younger, but not from a DSR point of view due to the age taboo. At some point, indeed, the guys will be clearly above the age of consent as per the jurisdiction, and the girls clearly below it.

My speech class for my lisp was a good social interaction class. I couldn't say r, as in Reggie and Weggi sound the same when I say it. There's a few other minor sounds, r being the main, but once a week I got to escape stifling class to talk with a nice lady, play games, and have some one on one interaction that was so severely lacking in the classroom.

school concentrates on studies and not on what gurls want.. focus shud be studies at least in the early age..

LOLWUT?
You can easily date a girl in school who's 3-4-5 years younger than you. You just won't be attending classes together, that's about it. Common school grounds, after-school time both still available. Besides, classes are for STUDYING, not making romance.
I know my buddies did that (lamely, for a couple of months), and I also attempted to do, but failed. (my oneitis was 3 years younger).
Not a problem.
Also, that 'exxie' troll is for once correct. It is near impossible to make curriculus for different-aged students, after all, most subjects are based on previous years' knowledge.

As for extra-curricular stuff, than YEAH, more than one class should be allowed. But again, nobody banned my friends from entering younger grade's school party when they came to their supposed 'girlfriends'. Hell, even people from other schools altogether were allowed, if you register them beforehand.
Face it, guys. You simply weren't invited. LS ones don't get invited, I know that myself too good.